Who's Defining Your Tech Future?
Tech leaders use 'inevitabilism' to control developers' futures. Learn how to spot AI brainwashing tactics and reclaim your coding destiny.
"AI Quill" Publication 200 Subscriptions 20% Discount Offer Link.
Brothers, let me ask you a question first:
Have you ever had this experience? In a technical review or solution discussion meeting, you clearly felt your idea was brilliant and your logic was sound, but you were left speechless by some big shot or old fox with just a few words?
They rambled on and on, refusing to discuss the core issues, specifically targeting those obscure details in your proposal.
You felt like a fool being roasted over a fire, frantically trying to explain problems that weren't even important. After a few rounds, you started doubting yourself, lost your momentum, your confidence crumbled, and in the end, you mindlessly accepted their "suggestions."
Doesn't that feel incredibly frustrating?
I used to fall for this trap all the time. Until a buddy of mine from college, who treated international debate competitions like a game (now he's a badass criminal lawyer), enlightened me.
He was drinking and patting my shoulder, saying: "Little Ke, debate is really just one trick—pull your opponent into your game rules. Once they start using your words, your logic, your framework to dialogue with you, it's basically settled. The rest is just a matter of volume."
At the time, I didn't quite get it, thinking this was just nonsense. Isn't coding about who has fewer bugs and better performance?